Rings are available only in
sizes indicated
The History of Navtive American Jewelry
Native American turquoise jewelry had origins that probably predate the advent
of the persons we describe as American Indians or Native Americans. However, for
the purpose of this paper we will consider prehistoric man as prehistoric Indian.
Archeological evidence shows us that stones (including turquoise), shells and
fetishes predate the Christian (epoch). Turquoise was found in Hohokam excavations
in southern Arizona that date 200 B.C., in central Mexico approximately 600-700
B.C. and in South America ca. 900 B.C. Other beads are even earlier. As Indian
jewelry and turquoise are so closely associated this paper will discuss both.
Turquoise as a mineral deposit is isolated to a rather limited geographical area
in the southwestern United States. Some is found in Mexico but very little and
there are some deposits in western South America. We will concentrate on that
found in the United States.
Prehistoric Indians mined turquoise and turned this product into jewelry, primarily
drilled beads and other hanging ornaments. However, archeological findings do
include applique on shell and other rock which means that it was probably used
with wood for ear decoration as well (the wood would have deteriorated.) Extensive
evidence of prehistoric mining operations have been found in several areas to
include: The Cerillos and Burro Mountain regions of New Mexico, the Kingman and
Morenci regions of Arizona and the Conejos area of Colorado. Turquoise jewelry
found in southern Mexico and in excavated mounds east of the Mississippi have
been analyzed and proclaimed to be from New Mexico's Cerillos mining area. As
this article deals with our Southwest other mining localities are not discussed.
Turquoise, although dominant in the jewelry finds (for example several thousand
pieces of turquoise were found in Chaco Canyon), it is not the only important
jewelry find. The spiny oyster shell (Spondylus Princeps) is found in only one
area in the Western Hemisphere- off the coast of Baja California. This shell has
been found in abundance in archeological excavations of the Anasazi, Mogollon
and Hohokam of the desert southwest. It has also been found in the same eastern
mound excavations in which turquoise was also found. These finds not only prove
early man and prehistoric man's interest and use of jewelry but it reveals important
economic information. It shows the existence of trading in his lifestyle. It also
provides a glimpse into probable status levels of the people.
One might argue that the above has little to do with the development of Indian
jewelry as we know it. However, as some (the Hopi and Pueblo cultures of the Rio
Grande) are indeed descended from the Anasazi and many believe from the Mogollon
and Mimbres as well, it seems to be a valid beginning of a historic tracing. The
Navajo, on the other hand, entered the area fairly recently. Some say as early
as the 14th century, others, as late as the early 16th. The Navajo, whenever they
arrived, had to be influenced by the existing Pueblo cultures and later were profoundly
influenced by the early Spanish. It is the hypothesis of this writer that a study
of the Navajo will give one the best historical trial for the development of Indian
jewelry in the Southwest. The Navajo, as we will see, were instrumental in the
spread of this craft to other southwestern tribes.
The Navajo must be considered nomadic within their "Dinetah" or homeland.
They were farmers only to the extent that they would plant a crop, leave it to
the vagaries of the weather and eventually return to reap the harvest, if any.
They and their Apache cousins could be likened to the early Mongols of the 12th
and 13th centuries. They not only raided but also took, kept and developed that
of the conquered that suited them. Beaded necklaces as a symbol of prestige, decorated
"ketoh" or bow guards and concha (concho) likely originated with their
most frequent contacts, the Spanish and their Pueblo neighbors.
The Navajo were in constant contact, some hostile, some friendly, with the Spanish
as they continued to populate the Southwest from the late 16th century on. From
these people the Indians developed a great appreciation for personal adornment.
Some of the early Spanish designs such as the Moorish inspired crescent and the
pomegranate blossom became key to Navajo jewelry design (More on this later in
the discussion of the origin of the Squash Blossom Necklace.)
In time the Spanish became dominant in the area. Although raids continued into
the 19th century, the period was better described as one of "suspicious-cautious
co- existence." It was a 200 plus year period of close association and the
sharing of the best of the several cultures. The Navajo wore the ornaments of
those they conquered or from trade with those they could not beat. These were
made from German silver (a copper-nickel-zinc substance) that was bright and wore
well, to copper, brass and to a much lesser extent, silver. They learned to appreciate
and hold dear the symbols of their prowess or their wealth. (No doubt early Navajo
wearing of a cross or the crescent shaped naja on a rawhide necklace did not reflect
their appreciation for Christianity or for the Moorish influence on the Spanish.)
Rather it was simply an ornament of beauty and pride. And, if one person had one,
others wanted one also and if possible, something even better. Thus the pendent
cross evolved as did the naja into a multitude of variations and blendings. The
simple thong on which they were displayed gave way to stone, shell, silver or
other metal beads.
The studies regarding the actual date that the Navajo began making silver jewelry
vary. The two best works are by John Adair and subsequent research and writings
by Carl Rosnek and Joseph Stacy (see suggested reading list.) All seem to agree
that Atsidi Sani (Old Smith) was the accepted first Navajo silversmith. He learned
the blacksmith trade in the early 1850's and possibly even dabbled in silver in
the early 1860's.
After much warfare, the warlike Navajo were captured by the United States Cavalry
and marched into captivity in 1864. Approximately 8000, to include Atsidi Sani,
were sent to Ft. Sumner in eastern New Mexico where they were to be weaned from
a nomadic and warlike lifestyle and taught to be farmers. The experiment failed
and in 1868 they were returned to the four corners area, the "Dinetah."
Although this date 1868 is accepted by many, to include the great Navajo leader
of the time, Chee Dodge, as the year Atsidi Sani learned the silver making skills,
there is evidence that this is not wholly correct. There is a tantalizing comment
by a Major Henry Wallen, the Commandant of Ft. Sumner in 1864. "Some of them
are quite clever as silversmiths." Of course he may have mistaken German
silver for "real silver." In any event Atsidi Sani wears the mantle
as the first Navajo silversmith.
The early Navajo silver work concentrated on concha (concho) belts, bracelets,
bow guards, tobacco flasks and necklaces. Rings, earrings, pins, hair ornaments,
buckles and bolos evolved from these. A full line of silver jewelry existed throughout
the reservation by the 1880's.
The earliest Navajo work consisted of hammered work with file decoration. Turquoise,
a very popular and much respected stone by the Navajo, made its appearance in
silver jewelry ca. 1880. It is important to note that turquoise, as a jewelry
item, had existed for centuries. It had been used in combination with other stones,
shells and metals long before 1880. However, the early Indian glued or otherwise
attached the turquoise to the stone, shell or metal. It is known that Mexican
silversmiths (plateros) toured the Indian pueblos and Navajo enclaves in the early-mid
1800's selling and trading silver jewelry for Indian products. This is the likely
origin of silver ornamentation in the Indian possession prior to ca. 1860. It
is fairly certain that there was no indigenous Navajo or pueblo silver industry.
Early Navajo smiths used Mexican and US coins for their silver. Often if they
were given a special order from a trader or local rancher or businessman they
would receive silver in the form of candlesticks, tea pots, etc. to melt for their
work. The Navajo preferred to use melted Mexican silver coins as they were the
easiest to work (.90275 fine.) Next preferred was what ever sterling silver was
available (.9025 fine.) Least desirable but the most durable was silver from melted
US coins (.900 fine.) The latter was the most readily available source. In 1890
the United States made it unlawful to melt of deface (such as soldering on hooks,
eyes, jump rings or "doming" coins for beads.) As this was difficult
to enforce, United States coinage continued to be used in the developing Navajo
silver industry. Now that there was a demand for materials and tools the reservation
traders began to stock many of the needed items. Although the Navajo were able
to make a flux out of native materials, the commercial flux was superior. Cutting,
grinding and fine polishing materials were commercially more desirable than home
made ones. This was the beginning of a new economy involving the Indians, traders
and eastern suppliers.
Very shortly, following Atsidi Sani's beginning Navajo silver smithing, the craft
spread across the area. He taught his sons and they taught others. The craft made
its appearance in Zuni ca. 1872. Atsidi Chon (Ugly Smith) taught his close Zuni
friend, Lanyade, the skills. The Zuni were already skilled in metal working making
items in copper, brass and iron. Research shows that a forge existed in Zuni in
1852. It is reported (see Rosneck and Stacy) that Lanyade paid Atsidi Chon "one
good horse" for his instruction.
Lanyade learned the trade well. He began touring the various pueblos selling his
jewelry. While on Hopi First Mesa at Sichomovi, he taught the first Hopi silversmith,
Sikyatala, the skills. As Lanyade was taught by a Navajo and the Hopi taught by
Lanyade all the jewelry of the period was Navajo in style. As a side note this
is why provenance (history of origin-ownership) is so important for 19th century
jewelry in properly identifying its origin. It's too easy to say that because
it looks like Navajo work it is therefore of Navajo origin.
During these early years the use of solder was learned and developed. Accompanying
this was the skills of making silver dies. The former permitted the artistic and
permanent joining of two or more metal pieces resulting in a multitude of design
possibilities and the setting of stones. Die making was probably adopted from
the many leather tooling dies that existed and were used by Spanish, Mexican and
later Indians in both leather work as well as tin smithing.
As the years progressed the styles that were basically of Navajo origin were gradually
modified by their pueblo students. For example: the Zuni, since prehistoric times,
were excellent lapidaries. These skills slowly changed their work to the fine
inlay and channel inlay we have come to associate with them. However, the Hopi
change occurred a bit more abruptly. In 1938 the Museum of Northern Arizona in
Flagstaff, Arizona, working with Hopi silversmiths, Paul Saufkie and Fred Kabote,
began a program of developing a style that was exclusively Hopi. The work was
interrupted by World War II. Following the war a government grant helped a silversmith
training program with the Hopi Guild. The "overlay" technique they created
involved the cutting of designs in a heavy gauge silver sheet and then soldering
this to a solid silver sheet. The designs were usually adapted from the pottery
shards found in the Sikyatki Pueblo ruins of the 15th and 16th centuries. These
pre-Hopi designs were mostly bird motifs. The Hopi Guild also used kachina symbols,
animal and clan motifs.
Today's Indian silversmiths are in many cases also goldsmiths and lapidaries
as well. They cross tribal design boundaries with a will and with abandon.
No longer can one look at a piece and say "It's Zuni style so it must
be Zuni made." The artist of today may incorporate in a single piece
all the styles available as well as his or her own innovation. Native American
turquoise jewelry today transcends tribal styles.
Turquoise in Native American Jewelry
In our earlier presentation "Turquoise, A Brief Overview and History"
printed, November 1992, the history of turquoise worldwide was discussed. We also
covered its occurrence, physical properties, various qualities, grades and a discussion
of what can and has been done to turquoise to improve its appearance and durability.
We highlighted not only stabilizing techniques and treating techniques but also
mentioned fake and synthetic turquoise.
Turquoise, as mentioned earlier has been native to jewelry in the Southwest for
over 2000 years. Then, as now the stone was deeply appreciated and held in much
reverence. No doubt the prehistoric Indians as well as the ancestors of our current
Native Americans ascribed a multitude of properties to this stone. For example:
-The Pima of southern Arizona- Turquoise was a talisman of good fortune and strength
to renounce ailments. However, if you lost a turquoise you would be afflicted
by a physical ailment treatable only by a medicine man.
-The Zuni believed the blue turquoise was male and of the sky, the green was female
and of the earth. Most Zuni fetishes were either made of turquoise or had turquoise
properties such as eyes, mouths, or attachments of turquoise to give it more power.
Turquoise was powerful and important to most early Indian ceremonials.
-The Rio Grande Pueblos- Most held the turquoise color came from being stolen
from the sky and preserved in stone. Their most precious idols were adorned with
turquoise. They also employ turquoise for good fortune.
-The Hopi have many traditions regarding turquoise. They, like their Rio Grande
Pueblo and Zuni contemporaries adorn their most important fetishes with turquoise
to enhance their powers. One legend has turquoise as the excrement of lizards.
The lizard is greatly respected for his above-below world connections. They hold
that turquoise can hold back the floods. (Floods were a common problem in the
desert southwest.)
-The Apache felt turquoise attached to a gun or a bow will cause the weapon to
shoot straight. It brought rain and could be found at the end of all rainbows.
It was key to the strength of their medicine men.
-The Navajo- Wearing turquoise brings good fortune to the wearer and insures their
favor with their Yeis (mediators between man and the supernatural). When thrown
into a river with the proper ceremonies it will aid in bringing rain. Turquoise
is offered to the Wind Spirit to appease him. The Navajo myth is that when the
wind is blowing it is searching for turquoise. The Navajo carve fetishes out of
turquoise for increased powers and fortunes. Turquoise is the sacred stone and
color of the South and the upper world. The Sacred Mountain of the South, Mt.
Taylor near Grants, New Mexico, is made from a mixture of turquoise and earth.
The mountains are inhabited by Turquoise Girl. Far to lengthy for this paper,
suffice to say, turquoise plays a multitude of roles in healing ceremonies and
sand paintings.
The Southwestern Indians use an abundance of turquoise in their jewelry. Some
of the turquoise is of exceptional quality and some is not even turquoise. Most
range between these extremes.
What is the best turquoise? For more on the intrinsic qualities that make up the
"best" as well as other grades and qualities, please review our November
1992 newsletter on Turquoise (see above). But what is the best turquoise for jewelry?
Now we proceed along a different path. Lets look at the variables as they apply.
What type of jewelry is desired? If the piece is to be "one of a kind"
competition, top investment quality, the turquoise should be gem grade and rare
(see November 1992 newsletter). The stone should compliment the artist and the
gold or silver work. The turquoise cost per carat can exceed $40.00 per carat.
Very high quality jewelry, equal to that mentioned above and also of investment
quality will require gem grade turquoise but not necessarily rare stones. The
beauty is there but the cost is not. These stones can cost from $10.00 to $20.00
per carat. On the surface these pieces will be equal in every respect but one-
rarity. A breathtakingly beautiful spider web cabochon of Chinese or Tibetan turquoise
can cost 75% less than a gem quality piece of Lander or Lone Mountain turquoise
for example.
If the goal is to produce, in quantity, high quality jewelry at a price the top
25% of the market can readily afford, then a very high grade to high grade turquoise,
properly selected for color, matrix balance, etc. is the goal. Turquoise should
cost in the $5.00 to $7.00 per carat range.
The vast majority of jewelry using natural turquoise is made from stones classified
as: Jewelry quality, high quality and investment quality (note: good stones, nice
luster but not sufficiently hard to preclude long term color change.) These stones
are too good to stabilize and should please nearly everyone. Their cost will be
$2.00 to $5.00 per carat.
Jewelry that involves the use of many matched cabochons or pieces of inlay nearly
always use a good quality turquoise that is stabilized so the color will not change.
A beautiful inlay or needle point necklace will loose its appeal if the turquoise
near the weavers neck begins to shade toward green because it is absorbing skin
oils while the remainder remains sky blue. Good stabilized turquoise is usually
sold by the pound as so much is wasted in cutting and grinding. In this work the
value of the turquoise is simply part of the value of the art work and over all
material cost for the piece.
Good to average quality , mine run, and stock qualities of turquoise are stabilized
and used for carving and craft shop jewelry. By and large this is an extremely
valuable area economically. It is estimated that over 70% of the Indian crafts
persons use this type turquoise either individually or as a shop worker. The result
is a beautifully balanced piece and remarkably low priced for the craftsmanship
involved. This is the quality of turquoise that created the Indian jewelry market
as we know it today. This stone is sold for approximately $80.00 per troy pound
but better color can double this.
The lowest qualities, chalk, chip stock and bulk must be stabilized to be used.
Often this turquoise is "color shot." In other words, artificially colored.
Much of this is used for assembly line manufacturing, machine stamped work, etc.
It too has a place in the market. It is sterling silver, it is turquoise and it
portrays the "Santa Fe look" at a remarkably low price. Many collectors
get their start here, liking the look and becoming interested in the whole field.
As they learn more their tastes change, almost always upward. This type of turquoise
is $20.00 to $30.00 a pound.
Fake and synthetic turquoise is often found in "Indian" turquoise
jewelry and turquoise rings made overseas- It too is available in the United
States and some of the native Americans use it. It has a place in the market
also as long as its looked at as art and craftsmanship. Look at the jewelry
as you would a painting. Don't look for material value.. only the value
of the art... the creation. Its cost on the market is approximately that
of the chip stock or bulk stabilized turquoise that is discussed above.
As you can see, turquoise values range dramatically and it is not always easy
to apply a value even though it is easy to establish a cost. In other words value
often exceeds cost because of the art work/craftsmanship involved. Sometimes turquoise
must be viewed as one does an oil painting. The individual components have little
or no value individually but as a whole the art work has significant value.
Suggested Readings- Nearly every book or paper on Indian jewelry and turquoise
starts, however briefly with some history of the stone and of the trade. We recommend
that the interested reader refer to the readings listed in our first paper, Turquoise
- A Brief Overview and History, Lee Anderson, November 1992 and: 1. John Adair,
The Navajo and Pueblo Silversmiths, University of Oklahoma Press, 1944. 2. Carl
Rosnek and Joseph Stacy, Skystone and Silver, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey, 1976. 3. Margery Bedinger, Indian Silver, Navajo and Pueblo Jewelers,
University of New Mexico Press, 1973. 4. Larry Frank, Indian Silver Jewelry of
the Southwest, Schiffer Publishing Ltd., Westchester, Pennsylvania, 1990.
|